This Week with Brian
Your Local Area
Including woken up, the Kremlin crocodile, a logical position, ten more years, size isn’t everything, a new era, Brexit still alive, the awfulness of referendums, a waste of human intelligence, a serious responsibility, presenting the invoice, privatising the air, watching the money, fixing the stuff, misogyny and domination, a suspect’s ethnicity, a wild garden, all four trophies, Lord Gnome steps in, Ricky Roma again, cutting the cloth, two teams, what noon meant, seven monarchs, exhausted bees and a happy man.
Click on the appropriate buttons to the right to see the local news from your area (updated every Thursday evening).
If there’s anything you’d like to see covered for your area or anything that you’d like to add to a segment that we’ve covered, drop me a line at brian@pennypost.org.uk.
Further afield
Donald Trump has finally woken –woke? – up to the fact that Putin has gone “absolutely crazy.” The Kremlin Crocodile’s enemies will say this happened a long time ago. However, much of PotUS’s chagrin seems to be directed not against what the man is doing in Ukraine – though he’s been consistent in pointing out how many people are being killed – but at Putin’s temerity at having somehow let him down. They had a two-hour conversation last week but this didn’t produce what Trump had hoped. “I’ve always had a very good relationship with Vladimir Putin,” he complained to CNN after the latest spate of attacks, “but something has happened to him…”
[more below]
• Crocodile
What’s happened is that Putin has seen that Trump has set himself unrealistic goals. Ending the war in 24 hours, as Trump claimed, was always going to be an easy one to disprove. Since then, carrying on as usual has suited Putin very well. Trump has divided his allies and, in so doing, given encouragement to his enemy. Any student of WW2 will know that they underestimate Russia’s ability to absorb punishment at their peril.
As I’ve suggested before, if you start from the position that the break-up of the USSR was the biggest geo-political disaster of the twentieth century and that the regime in Ukraine is suspect (i.e. “fascist”) because it has pro-west leanings, as Putin does, then his stance is logical. Western views about international law, post-1989 settlements and the UN are beside the point.
This is a basic, xenophobic, nationalistic and ruthless motivation we’re dealing with. If the Baltic states and other former USSR possessions aren’t worried then they ought to be.
At 72 years old, and with an almost total grip on his country, Putin is probably good for at least another ten years. How much of this is his own personal mission I’m not qualified to say. When he finally leaves the scene, who’s to say that there’s not an even more serious hardass waiting to take over this vast country. Russian history has been full of them.
• Size
This leads me to another thought, which I shall leave dangling for now.
It seems that the likelihood of any state developing a system of representative democracy is in inverse proportion to its size. Just looking back at the last five hundred years, Russia, China, India and the various Islamic empires and states were vast and yet didn’t do it. Athens, England, the Netherlands and (as it then was) the USA were small, and yet did.
I make no claim about which approach for ruling is preferable and am reminded of Churchill’s remark that democracy is the worst system of all, apart from all the others. None the less, through having lived in a stable democracy my entire life, I’m pre-disposed in its favour: as, no doubt, are others about their systems. None the less, I can’t help feeling pleased that no one is going to break our door down should I happen to criticise it. This is, perhaps, what the fight is about in Ukraine.
• Brexit
The Week reports that Keir Starmer hailed a “new era” in relations with Europe this week after the UK and Brussels agreed a post-Brexit “reset”. Opinions have differed on some of the details but the main advantage seems to me that the UK will continue to abide by EU food standards. Anything that Italy, France and Spain regard as being good practice in this regard tests higher with me than what the USA thinks. Punitive sanctions – perhaps for a day, perhaps for for four years – may follow from Washington.
Some of the comments about this deal, which wouldn’t have been necessary were we still to have been in the EU, made me realise just how alive the Brexit debate still is. I get that it didn’t turn out the way I hoped. The simple stay/leave option, however, has proved to be anything but.
What I really object to is the idea that we’re somehow more free as a result of our decision. An example of this is from The Daily Telegraph, quoted in The Week, that “Starmer is ceding our independence in this area, just when we’re starting to capitalise on the benefits of being able to forge our own path.” Our own path to what? To adopting US food standards? It’s now nearly ten years since the hapless David Cameron caved in to pressure to ask a question, to which he didnlt know the answer, to save his party from collapse – that didn’t work – by holding a referendum.
• Referendums
What awful things these are. The Swiss seem to have them about every twenty minutes. Thank goodness we don’t.
Last time I checked, we elect governments – and local councils –to make decisions. The claim that the public should decide is trotted out if this suits the need of the party calling the referendum. As matters showed before, during and – in particular – after that ghastly campaign, something so important can’t be reduced to a binary choice on which a few demagogues can influence public opinion. If David Cameron was foolish in allowing the referendum to happen, he was far more culpable in running such an ineffective campaign.
The other point is that the 2016 referendum had nothing to do with expressing the will of the people and everything to do with trying to heal wounds in the Conservative party. Each referendum, or election, costs the state about £130m. We’ll say nothing about the money that Theresa May had to pay the creationists in Northern Ireland for their support after her disastrous 2017 election. However, I’d like to see an invoice for £260m presented to Tory HQ to cover these fiascos. I’m not holding my breath.
The reality is that the severance, or rapprochement, with the EU continues. I’ve seen no beneficial dividends from our having left the EU in a huff, slamming the front door behind us. Now we’re trying, or so some claim, to crawl back in through the cat flap. Many fine minds have spent innumerable hours trying to solve the problems poised by Brexit. The recent announcements are part of this process. Those who believed that the result would produce some great new future for the country, freed from the shackles of a heavy-handed state, are in my opinion utterly deluded.
As for the business of trying to negotiate our departure and future relations, I’m reminded of Raymond Chandler’s description of chess as being “as elaborate a waste of human intelligence as you can find outside an advertising agency.” The slogan on the side of the bus about the NHS was probably conceived by an advertising agency, or by someone who now works in that world. God help us all…
• Water
The Guardian reports that Thames Water “has been hit with a record £104m fine over environmental breaches involving sewage spills, after failing to operate and manage its treatment works and wastewater networks effectively.”in addition to this is a “£18.2m fine for breaking dividend rules, the first of its kind in the industry, which was first reported by the Guardian in December. Ofwat said the company had paid out cash to investors despite having fallen short in its services to customers and its environmental record.”
The BBC added that Thames Water said the company took its “responsibility towards the environment very seriously.” Many will find this an astonishing statement and provides proof, if further proof be needed, of how far performance can fall short of press releases.
Two big questions remain. The first is what is going to happen to Thames Water. Nationalisation arguments have been hovering around all the water firms although, despite their nil value by many reckonings, political problems remain about taking them over. It would, after all, never do to spook the markets.
None the less, water is like air – though that’s something no one has, yet, found a way of owning – vital to our lives, even more than are railways and banks. For a government to provide this is thus surely amongst its primary concerns. However, how much better would nationalised water companies do? Decades of under-investment, the increasing demands of development and the problems of climate change will require massive and well-spent sums to combat.
Can we trust our rulers, who have a presided over a series of fiascos, including HS2 and a number of major IT projects, to do any better? Indeed, can any of us be trusted with something collective on this scale?
The other question is what’s going to happen to the money. There was a proposal a couple of years ago whereby environmental fines would be kept within that sector, rather than poured into the Treasury. I confess not to have kept up with what the policy is on this.
In a rational world, these sums should be paid (a) into a rang-fenced fund for repairs and investment, (b) to the Environment Agency and OfWat to strengthen their enforcement procedures and (c) to local riparian charities like Action for the River Kennet (numerous other ones exist elsewhere) who actually do something about repairing the damage. As the world is not rational, it’s possible that none of these things happen.
• Mending
According to the Reuse and Repair Declaration, the UK is “the second highest producer of electronic waste per capita in the world. Yet we are falling behind other countries in support for repair and reuse to tackle throwaway products. Repair and reuse are central to achieving a truly circular, less wasteful, economy. They help to tackle climate change and achieve our net zero ambition, reduce living costs for UK households and create green skilled jobs.”
Repairing has long been a neglected skill and, as the statement points out, there are several obstacles faced by those who want to get things fixed. Not the least of these is that many items are now deliberately designed to make them hard or impossible to get into. After all, there’s a new model out now which only costs £50 more and is shinier and brighter and with a bit of luck will not pack up before its replacement is in turn launched: and so it goes on.
I’m not particularly good at fixing things. If WD40, superglue, duct tape or a large hammer won’t work then I’m a bit stumped. Fortunately there are now repair cafés across the country, including in Hungerford, Wantage, Thatcham and Newbury where experts can do the things I can’t.
The Repair and Reuse Declaration is trying to make it easier for such people to get inside these items. Have a look at the proposals and, if you agree, add your signature to the petition.
• And finally…
• The BBC reports that the Crown Prosecution Service has confirmed for the first time “the full list of 21 charges Andrew and Tristan Tate will face when they are returned to the UK, including rape, actual bodily harm and human trafficking. Good. As a heterosexual male I feel myself to be slightly degraded by the culture of misogyny and domination that they seem to represent.
This story has made me think back to what rubbish as a teenager I believed about women, people and life in general. I choose not to reflect on what even worse version of myself I might have become were such people to have got their claws into me. At that age, we’re ripe for the picking.
• The culprit of the horrible and seemingly drug-fuelled, rather then terrorist-related, incident in Liverpool at the football clubs’s champion’s parade was quickly revealed by the Police to have been a white male. This might have been a sensible defusement of a trope. However, there’s a price to be paid. Does that mean that if the ethnicity of a suspect is not announced within an hour or so that we can assume something else, and riot accordingly?
• We’ve decided to leave large parts of our garden wild, which you can interpret as anything from our being too lazy to mow and weed to creating a wonderful habitat for insects. For about six weeks in early summer, if we’re lucky, this pays dividends with a wonderful crop of bee-friendly flowers which also look lovely.
If you’re not careful, though, “no mow May” and “let it bloom June” can easily run into “why did we let it grow so high July”, when all these plants grow too tall, collapse and tangle together like the fur of an unkempt Persian cat. This year – the more so as everything has been advanced by several weeks because of the warm weather – we must have the strength of mind to cut back when the plants are in their prime.
• Football news to finish with. Chelsea won the Europa Conference League on Wednesday, beating Real Betis 4-1. A great week for London clubs, with Spurs having won the Europa League and Arsenal the big one of the women’s Champions League. Well done to all of them.
In the process, Chelsea accomplished two major achievements. The first was to be the only club to have won all four of the officially recognised UEFA competitions, including the now defunct Winners Cup. The second was ending a remarkable run of 27 consectutive international and club finals, going back to 2002, in which Spanish teams have been victorious. I was born in a hospital that overlooked Chelsea’s Stamford Bridge ground but have never supported them. However, now I have to extend to the club some sneaking admiration…
Across the area
• Community Infrastructure Levies – Private Eye gets involved
I’ve mentioned about the CIL (Community Infrastructure Levy) scandal a few times, most recently last week. This relates to the iniquity of homeowners being charged harrowing sums as a result of minor paperwork errors for small extensions and the like that should have been exempt. £235,000 is the highest demand I’ve heard of so far.
I’m now aware of at least nine authorities which have succumbed to the temptation of ripping off their residents in this way. So far, only our own West Berkshire has taken the brave step of admitting that it screwed up and refunding the money.
No response as yet from the Local Government Association to the letter I quoted last week, by the way. This is disappointing as the issue casts a shadow over the reputation of the councils the organisation represents. I’d have thought the LGA might be interested in this, or at least have the courtesy to say “thank you for bringing this matter to our attention.” Seems not.
You can read my summary of the situation in this article.
One of the things that few councils want is to be featured in the Rotten Boroughs section of Private Eye. The stories are never complimentary to the authorities or individuals involved. Hypocrisy, greed, graft, stupidity, incompetence and worse are exposed on a fortnightly basis. I suspect that the one page that’s devoted to this could easily be extended to two or three without any drop in quality.
I’m delighted to announce that, after some prompting by me and several of the victims, the most recent Private Eye (1650) has run this as its lead story.
In the dock is Waverley Council in Surrey, which seems recently to have made quite a lucrative sideline in persecuting local homeowners. The story the Eye focussed on was that of Steve Dally who unexpectedly found himself charged £67,000 for demolishing a poorly built extension and putting up a replacement. He needed to re-mortgage his house to pay the charge and will, if the matter isn’t resolved, need to sell it when the repayment is due.
The article mentions that twenty other residents have come forward. I’m aware of several of these on an ever-growing WhatsApp group of which I’m a member.
The last sentence of the piece – “Watch this space” – is encouraging for those who’re hoping for further coverage. The Eye knows, not least because I’ve told them, that there are similar cases in other districts as well. I hope that space will also be made for them.
One of the tactics used here in West Berkshire – as it was in the Post Office disaster, which this in so many ways resembles – was to convince each victim that they were a unique case. A vital challenge, in both scandals, is to get people to come forward. Some may have thought that the council was right and that it was their fault; have blotted the whole thing out; or – as some people do after being scammed, which is one description of what this is – feel too ashamed to admit that they were had.
I know that people read this column who aren’t in the districts (West Berkshire, the southern part of the Vale and the eastern part of Wiltshire) that we cover. If you, or anyone you know, have been affected by this, please email me on brian@pennypost.org.uk and I can put you in touch with the WhatsApp group. The more people who come forward, the more chance there is of getting something done.
I can do no better than to refer again to Ricky Roma’s (Al Pacino) tumultous rant in Glengarry Glen Ross. “What you’re hired to do,” he tells the office manager Williamson (Kevin Spacey) after he’s just wrecked one of Roma’s deals, “is to help us. Does that seem clear to you? To help us – not to fuck us up.” Councils are fond of slogans. Many could do worse than adopt this one as their own.
In the meantime, I shall be watching the space in the Rotten Boroughs column in the Eye. I commend the magazine for its coverage. There’s a lot more to come on this.
• Cutting the cloth
Everyone knows that district and similar councils are under the financial cosh. These provide hundred of services, some of which are statutory, others more discretionary. The latter are obviously the vulnerable ones
West Berkshire Council has identified (though not widely shared) about fifty which it’s planning to cut, ranging from street lights to verge trimming and from dog bins to resource centres. It’s also suggested that the situation represents an opportunity for towns and parishes, the lowest layer of the democracy pyramid, to respond to local demand and fill the gap.
Well, yes and no. I don’t know how such discussions are going elsewhere: but here in WB I get the strong impression that there’s not been enough communication about what the real situation is and what services might need to be, as the euphemism is, devolved.
Four aspects need to be clarified:
- What services might be cut by WBC (or fill in the name of your own authority).
- What the statutory minimum provision of each service is (which might be zero).
- What level of each service is currently provided to that parish.
- Whether WBC can continue provide any services in addition to the statutory minimum and, if so, how much it will charge.
If WBC doesn’t know the answers to every single one of these questions then it ought to.
There’s a perfectly good case to be made by WBC to the parishes, and by the parishes to their residents, that this change needs to happen. Yes, we might need to pay in our parish precepts (increases in which are not limited, unlike with council tax) to pay for services previously provided by the parent authority. With the right communication and explanation, people might accept this.
However, this takes time. The parishes need the information summarised above to decide what they feel their residents want and then, if necessary, to ask them. The decisions will have implications for their 2026-27 budgets. If this is left too late then there’ll be recriminations, stress and poor decisions.
The question of what services WBC might continue to provide, for a fee – “additionality” is the euphemism in this case – is particularly important if we’re to avoid a postcode lottery.
Probably only the the three towns (Hungerford, Thatcham and Newbury) and a few larger parishes like Burghfield, Pangbourne, Mortimer and Lambourn have the staff and the structure to take on managing any services themselves.
Most parishes are small, run by volunteers (as all are), staffed by Clerks who might work a day a week if that and possessed of no easy way of communicating with residents.
A few, like Winterbourne and Fawley, are non-precepting and so have no capacity at all either to absorb extra services or to pay for them.
Solutions to this potential three-tier problem can be found. In Compton, for instance, the parish council recently suggested itself as a hub for the pop-up library service to assist its even smaller neighbours. Enborne has been looking ways of working with its own neighbours to reduce overheads and share resources. Several parishes currently have joint ownership of SIDs to combat speeding.
This kind of co-operation might be needed for other services as well. The parishes cannot, however, help either themselves or each other until they know exactly what is being asked of them. The more delay there is from WBC, the worse the situation will become.
Many services, once stopped, become difficult or expensive to resume. A waste bin, if no longer to be emptied, needs to removed. Restoring it later will cost money. The decision about whether the parish should retain it, and how much it will cost, takes time to make.
I’m sympthetic to WBC’s situation. So too, I suspect, would be many parishes, were they to know exactly what they might need to take on. This sympathy will diminish with every week that passes without a clear and universal plan.
Parishes can be WBC’s allies in addressing this funding crisis that’s not of either of their making. What WBC should avoid is withholding or drip-feeding information and so turning them into frustrated enemies. It needs to act now to communicate this new reality and the choices that are required.
• News from your local councils
Most of the councils in the area we cover are single-tier with one municipal authority. The arrangements in Oxfordshire are (currently, at least) different, with a County Council which is sub-divided into six district councils, of which the Vale of White Horse is one. In these two-tier authorities, the county and district have different responsibilities.
In all cases, parish and town councils provide the first and most immediately accessible tier of local government.
West Berkshire Council
• Click here to see the latest Residents’ News Bulletin from WBC.
• Click here for details of all current consultations being run by WBC.
• Click here to sign up to all or any of the wide range of newsletters produced by WBC.
• Click here for the latest news from WBC.
Vale of White Horse Council
• Click here for details of all current consultations being run by the Vale Council.
• Click here for latest news from the Vale Council.
• Click here for the South and Vale Business Support Newsletter archive (newsletters are generally produced each week).
• Click here to sign up to any of the newsletters produced by the Vale’s parent authority, Oxfordshire County Council.
Wiltshire Council
• Click here for details of all current consultations being run by Wiltshire Council.
• Click here for the latest news from Wiltshire Council.
Swindon Council
• Click here for details of all current consultations being run by Swindon Council.
• Click here for the latest news from Swindon Council.
Parish and town councils
• Please see the News from your local council section in the respective weekly news columns (these also contain a wide range of other news stories and information on activities, events and local appeals and campaigns): Hungerford area; Lambourn Valley; Marlborough area; Newbury area; Thatcham area; Compton and Downlands; Burghfield area; Wantage area.
• Other news
• West Berkshire Council is running an online information session for those who want to know what is involved in working as a registered childminder, childminding assistant or nanny. This will take place at 7pm on Thursday 12 June. To register, please email earlyyearsservice@westberks.gov.uk or call 01635 503 500.
• From 1 July, children aged from four to eleven years can visit any West Berkshire Library to sign up for the Summer Reading Challenge. If you would like to get involved by volunteering to help run the Reading Challenge at your local library this Summer, you can contact the team here.
• West Berkshire Council has launched its new Let’s Talk Community Outreach service. “The Let’s Talk West Berkshire hub is all about bringing support closer to you,” a Council statement explains. “Whether you need help filling in forms, using technology, finding the right services, or just want a friendly chat, we’re here for you.”
• The Public Protection Partnership is proud to be supporting colleagues at Stop Loan Sharks during Stop Loan Sharks Week.
• 12 to 25 May is Foster Care Fortnight: see the 14 May Residents’ Bulletin or this page on WBC’s website for more information.
• As mentioned previously Joseph Holmes (formerly the interim CEO) has been appointed CEO of West Berkshire Council.
• West Berkshire Council is highlighting how the National Wraparound Childcare Programme can help parents and carers.
• The animal of the week is this cunning pelican spider on the hunt for his next meal.
• A number of good causes have received valuable support recently: see the various news area sections (links above) for further details.
The quiz, the sketch, the fact and the song
• So here we are again at the song of the week. God, I love this one, which takes me right back to 1987: Thomas Lang’s The Happy Man.
• And then it’s the Comedy Moment of the Week. QI has wise (and also some not so wise) advice on a number of matters. This clip concentrates on what’s the best thing for an exhausted bee.
• And so we come the Unbelievable Fact of the Week. This has been gleaned from Edward Brooke-Hitching’s The Most Interesting Book in the World, described as “a miscellany of things too strange to be true, yet somehow are”. This week’s is that noon (from nona hora, the ninth hour, in Latin) meant 3pm until the fourteenth century.
• And, fourthly and lastly, the Quiz Question of the Week. This week’s question is: There were seven Scottish monarchs who acceded to the throne between 1406 and 1567. Apart from their all being Stuarts (and all Scottish monarchs), what unfortunate fact did they all have in common? Last week’s question was: There have been six European football finals that have featured only English sides. Which two teams, both from the same city, have taken part in all of these (though never against each other)? The answer is Spurs and Chelsea, in various finals of the UEFA Cup/Europa League (UC) and the Champions League (CL). Spurs beat Wolves in the 1972 UL final, lost to Liverpool in the 2019 CL final and beat Man Utd in the UL final last week. Chelsea lost to Man Utd in the 2008 CL final, beat Arsenal in the 2019 UL final and beat Man City in the 2021 CL final. Italy and Spain have each been responsible for five such national match-ups, Germany for two and Portugal for one. Now you know…
For weekly news sections for Hungerford area; Lambourn Valley; Marlborough area; Newbury area; Thatcham area; Compton and Downlands; Burghfield area; Wantage area please click on the appropriate link.
4 Responses
Thanks Brian!
I agree, the KC IS ‘old and tired’ looking.
I feel it just needs opening-out to be rid of that dated enclosed louring atmosphere. However, surely the retail units themselves are still perfectly ‘servicable’…..
Thing is, I DON’T drive, so I’d be dreading that any existing shop, if it didn’t just shut down, then would simply decamp to some out-of-town location.
The wonderful seconds shops I mentioned before are enormous and would need hangar-sized accommodation – which, I fear, would not be found in any town-centre retail unit.
It’s probably just a ‘fluke’ that the KC, an in-town location, happened to have these vast retail units that could accommodate such shops as these.
I thought that the developers were only interested in building ‘luxury’/upmarket dwellings. I’d feel far more sympathetic if it would see its way to providing much-needed social/affordable housing instead.
But, as you said, the state more or less discarded any responsibility for social housing, so outsourced to the private sector which, frankly, doesn’t want to give a damn about needy people eating into their profits.
I’m assuming you meant ‘1980’ rather than ‘1908’…..!
Yes: thanks for the date correction…
Re: The appeal into the Eagle Quarter refusal.
I’m rather hoping EVERYTHING would get refused! –
ANYthing to keep those two amazing seconds stores running – ‘Aladdins Cave’ and the old Peacocks store, now another seconds store, both in the Kennet Centre ‘plaza’.
We NEED seconds stores – FAR more than we need a lot of twee ‘luxury’ houses or flats.
If social housing got developed there instead, surely that would make a good combination, with the seconds stores still around…..
But I fear that developers are not only greedy for profit, they are also monumental snobs, who only want to bother with the affluent upstarts, rather than for anyone in need or for anything ‘ecofriendly’.
Hi Kate,
Thanks for your comment.
I know a number of people feel that the KC should stay as a centre, and those shoips too, but many more think the place is tired and old and could be put to better use.The stores such as you mention could exist elsewhere. There’s empty retail space in Newbury.
Many people also agree about the lack of affordable housing and tis remains a concern with both applications.
Whether this is how we’d like things to be or not, the developers exist to make money and, in their defence, have a good deal of costs and risks to bear.
In my view, the problem is not with the individual developers but with the fact that, since the 1980s, the state almost entirely washed its hands of the responsibility for building social housing. Almost all house-building has been outsorced to the provate sector which doesn’t find this profitable. The analogy I use if of a shop which is rung up by the government and told that from now on, to satisfy government policy, it’s going to have to sell 30 to 40 percent of its goods at cost price. “If that’s what you want,” the shopkeeper might say, “then go and open up your own shop…”